Verified Voting Logo
Edit Your PreferencesContact VerifiedVoting.orgAbout VerifiedVoting.org
Verified Voting HomeJoin - Help us do this work!Donate - Help us do this work!Take Action Today!Endorse the resolution!
Printer Friendly Version
Site Map

See information for:

VerifiedVoting.org engages in lobbying activities permitted by IRC Section 501(c)(4). Please visit the Verified Voting Foundation for info about 501(c)(3) educational activities. You can also visit Vote Trust USA, a project of the Verified Voting Foundation.

E-Mail This Page

Home   »  Manual Audit Requirements


Manual Audit Requirements

by Pam Smith and Bob Kibrick

A number of states have enacted requirements for mandatory manual audits (in randomly selected precincts) of the voter-verified paper records produced by the voting systems in use in those states. These audits are designed to verify that the electronic voting systems (either DRE voting machines or optical scan voting systems) are accurately recording and counting the votes. In the randomly-selected precincts, a hand count of the voter-verified paper records is compared to the totals reported by the electronic voting system.

At least two states without voter-verified paper record requirements (Kentucky, Pennsylvania) also have audit requirements. These were written into statute decades ago, apparently prior to widespread adoption of (paperless) direct recording electronic (DRE) voting systems. It is unclear whether -- or how -- these states are carrying out their statutory audit requirement. Texas requires audits of optical scan paper ballot systems only; counties with DREs have no voter-verified paper records to audit.

Verified Voting has compiled a document that lists these mandatory manual audit requirements along with citations of the relevant legislative text. This document is available as a PDF-format document that includes links to the cited legislation.

Pending Legislation

New Mexico - SB 0072 - AN ACT RELATING TO ELECTIONS; REQUIRING A POST-ELECTION EVALUATION OF THE ACCURACY OF VOTING SYSTEMS; PROVIDING PROCEDURES; REPEALING AND ENACTING SECTIONS OF THE NMSA 1978.



Important Links

  • Election Workers: Take our 2008 Election Worker Survey
  • Election Day Problems?
    Call 1-866-OUR-VOTE
  • Find Your Polling Place: Vote411.org
  • Questions? contact@verifiedvoting.org
  • Vote Trust USA - national resource for state-based organizations supporting verifiable elections, a Verified Voting Foundation project

  • Get E-Mail Alerts




    ANNOUNCEMENTS

    June 21, 2009
    How to Trust Electronic Voting
    June 21, 2009
    The Voter Confidence and Increased Accessibility Act of 2009
    June 7, 2009
    Civic Organizations Urge Lawmakers to Follow Through on Trustworthy Voting Systems
    June 2, 2009
    The Internet and Voting: Worth Doing Right
    May 29, 2009
    Aloha Means 'Goodbye' Too
    May 28, 2009
    Congress Must Help Military Vote
    May 26, 2009
    New report highlights lessons learned following Minnesota election audit and recounts
    May 23, 2009
    Honolulu declares all-digital election a winner
    April 28, 2009
    In Memoriam: John Gideon
    April 13, 2009
    Liberadio interview with Sean Flaherty
    March 30, 2009
    WV: Preserve Voting Integrity
    March 24, 2009
    WV: Bill would sink touch-screen voting
    March 23, 2009
    Diebold admits voting system flaws
    March 18, 2009
    VA: Big Questions about Voting Machines
    March 18, 2009
    Virginia's Voting Glitches
    February 23, 2009
    E-voting security fixes will get us nowhere without stats
    February 20, 2009
    Cem Kaner's comments on new EAC Guidelines regarding software independence
    January 27, 2009
    League of Women Voters Publishes Report on Election Auditing, Endorses Risk-Limiting Tabulation Audits
    January 26, 2009
    NJ: It should be simple
    January 11, 2009
    AZ: Databases for elections released to Democrats



    "The core of our American democracy is the right to vote. Implicit in that right is the notion that that vote be private, that vote be secure, and that vote be counted as it was intended when it was cast by the voter. And I think what we're encountering is a pivotal moment in our democracy where all of that is being called into question." (more here)

    Kevin Shelley, former
    California Sec. of State





    VerifiedVoting.org, Inc., is a 501(c)(4) nonprofit corporation.

    © Copyright 2008, VerifiedVoting.org, Inc. All rights reserved, although reprint permission granted for nonprofit purposes with attribution to VerifiedVoting.org.


    Privacy    Site Map