Verified Voting Logo
Edit Your PreferencesContact VerifiedVoting.orgAbout VerifiedVoting.org
Verified Voting HomeJoin - Help us do this work!Donate - Help us do this work!Take Action Today!Endorse the resolution!
Printer Friendly Version
Site Map

See information for:

VerifiedVoting.org engages in lobbying activities permitted by IRC Section 501(c)(4). Please visit the Verified Voting Foundation for info about 501(c)(3) educational activities. You can also visit Vote Trust USA, a project of the Verified Voting Foundation. Also, check out our blog and twitter feed.

E-Mail This Page

Home   »  Press / Media  »  Media Coverage  »  VerifiedVoting.Org  »  Election 2004: Officials concerned ...


Election 2004: Officials concerned about a shortage of paper votes

by Cathy Zolllo, crzollo@naplesnews.comstory here
July 7th, 2004

Naples Daily News
 
URL: http://www.naplesnews.com/npdn/news/article/0,2071,NPDN_14940_3017025,00.html
Election 2004: Officials concerned about a shortage of paper votes

By CATHY ZOLLO, crzollo@naplesnews.com
July 7, 2004

The quarter of American voters who will face the same voting equipment that threw the country into presidential mayhem after the 2000 election aren't the only ones elections observers are worried about.

As the November election draws near, the call for verified votes — paper ballots — to be spewed from the growing number of electronic voting machines in use is growing in volume.

And that's just as Florida is wading through problems with electronic voting machines in use in 15 of the state's 67 counties, home to more than half of the state's voting population.

The American Civil Liberties Union of Florida announced Tuesday that it plans to sue the state over the machine glitch, though officials wouldn't talk about specifics until they file the suit today.

As well, the League of Women Voters of the United States recently withdrew its support of electronic voting machines that don't provide paper ballots, moving to a neutral stance on the issue. And activists assailed lawmakers in Washington over recent weeks, asking for legislation requiring paper receipts.

Elections officials in Miami-Dade County spotted the glitch last summer that affects the iVotronic machines manufactured by Elections Systems & Software. The machines are in use in 11 Florida counties, including Collier and Lee, with the remaining four counties that use electronic voting machines having bought theirs from another company.

In early 2002, Collier County spent roughly $4.3 million for an electronic voting machine system and two years of maintenance from ES&S, an Omaha, Neb.,-based company.

Lee County also bought the same type of machines at roughly the same time, spending $5.4 million to bring the county up to date on election technology and in compliance with the state's Election Reform Act of 2001.

Supervisors of elections from both counties said they've done extensive testing of the machines, and they are confident they will perform as expected in the August and November elections. They say the machines have proven reliable time and time again in dry runs called logic and accuracy tests that come before each election and during elections.

The glitch intermittently scrambles machine serial numbers during the post-election audit when election officials would recount the results of a close race.

ACLU of Florida Executive Director Howard Simon said that could affect recounts in a close election.

"The reason that voting officials and county supervisors (of elections) and other computer experts say that we don't need a paper trail is that the machines have the capacity to produce an audit log in case of a close election," Simon said. "The audit log is supposed to be the alternative to the paper tail, and the audit trail is in question."

Nicole deLara, spokeswoman for Florida Secretary of State Glenda Hood, said a fix is in the works and is being tested in Miami-Dade County through Thursday. She was unable to say when, should it work, the state might certify it for use in upcoming elections.

The delay in getting the fix in place sooner, she said, arose because the problem didn't happen consistently, and technicians at ES&S had to re-create it before they could fix it. As well, she said the division didn't learn about the problem until recently.

Hood has come under fire for not making public the problem or addressing it sooner, but deLara said part of the blame lies with Miami-Dade officials.

"The first time the secretary of state learned about it was upon reading an article in the Miami Daily Business Review," deLara said. "The Miami-Dade supervisor of elections was aware of it last summer."

DeLara said notification that came ahead of the article, from the Miami-Dade Coalition for Election Reform, got lost in the shuffle because it was on page six of a nine-page letter dealing almost exclusively with another issue.

"Should somebody have caught it? Maybe," deLara said. "We'd have liked to see that from the supervisor of elections office a year ago."

Simon supports having paper ballots printed for each voter using an electronic machine. But he said that with the delays in implementing the Help America Vote Act, there is no time to get the machines ready to produce paper ballots and have the printers certified prior to the November election.

"At this point it is doesn't make any sense to talk about the paper trail. We are forced to talk about what Band-Aids can be applied to the system to increase voter confidence in the accuracy of the system," Simon said.

Hood and Gov. Jeb Bush have attacked the groups questioning the machines, saying they are undermining voter confidence ahead of an important election, and deLara echoed that concern.

"These groups do a disservice to their constituents," deLara said, pointing to hundreds of successful elections at the local level that have taken place since the state passed the Election Reform Act of 2001. "Florida has taken enormous strides since 2000. . . We are a national leader in election reform. We have some of the most stringent certification standards in the nation."

Activists say just the opposite, accusing Bush and Hood of trying to silence talk of problems with the machines.

"I don't think we're the ones shaking voter confidence," said Pam Smith, nationwide coordinator for VerifiedVoting.org, a California-based, nonpartisan lobbying group.

"When you look at the whole system and you take all those pieces that are supposed to insure a secure vote, you can knock those pins over one at a time."

Besides which, activists say elections haven't been smooth in every place where the machines are in use.

In California, there were problems with poorly trained poll workers, incorrectly assigned ballots and machines that didn't undergo the testing required by the federal government.

And seniors in Broward County seemed to have greater difficulty than younger voters operating the machines. They had double and triple the rate of undervotes than in precincts where the average age was younger, the South Florida Sun-Sentinel recently reported.

Copyright 2004, Naples Daily News. All Rights Reserved.

The Verifier Map

How do Americans cast their ballots? See the Verifier Map for detailed information on voting systems used in each state and county in recent elections.

voting equipment used in earlier elections (2004/2006)


Get E-Mail Alerts




Announcements

July 27, 2010
State Election Officials: Recountable Process A Must for Overseas Voters
July 20, 2010
Online Voting: All That Glitters Is Not Gold (Unless You're a Vendor)
June 21, 2010
Voting Without A Net In South Carolina
June 17, 2010
Voting results in New Jersey should not be mysterious
June 16, 2010
Verified Voting Calls for Recountable, Auditable Voting Systems Following South Carolina Primary
June 16, 2010
Voting integrity groups call for investigation of South Carolina voting systems in wake of unexpected primary results in Democratic US Senate race
June 15, 2010
On the South Carolina Primary
May 23, 2010
Benefits, risks of e-mail ballots weighed
May 4, 2010
PA - Team 4: Security Concerns About Voting Machines Remain
April 26, 2010
California Assembly committee endorses UC Berkeley statistician's election auditing method
March 8, 2010
Feds Move to Break Voting-Machine Monopoly
March 2, 2010
Is the Internet the Right Place for Our Ballots? Election Administration and Voting Rights Thought Leaders Weigh in on the Future of Overseas Voting at Summit 2010
February 25, 2010
Minnesota Civic Groups Refute Recount Claims
February 17, 2010
Groups and Election Officials Warn Department of Justice that Voting Machine Vendor Merger will Inflate Costs to Taxpayers, Threaten Election Accuracy and National Security
February 11, 2010
Fla. justices uphold local election law
February 3, 2010
NJ Judge Issues Mixed Order on Use of E-voting Machines
February 1, 2010
Ruling Issued in Rutgers–Newark Law School’s Constitutional Litigation Clinic Challenge to NJ's Electronic Voting Machines
February 1, 2010
Holt Statement on NJ Court Decision on Paper Ballots
January 28, 2010
Internet Voting, Still in Beta
January 28, 2010
MD: State elections head says new voting system costly, not effective

Important Links

  • VVBlog: Check out the latest news and commentary at our blog.
  • Election Day Problems?
    Call 1-866-OUR-VOTE
  • Find Your Polling Place: Vote411.org
  • Questions? Contact Us
  • Vote Trust USA - national resource for state-based organizations supporting verifiable elections, a Verified Voting Foundation project



  • "The core of our American democracy is the right to vote. Implicit in that right is the notion that that vote be private, that vote be secure, and that vote be counted as it was intended when it was cast by the voter. And I think what we're encountering is a pivotal moment in our democracy where all of that is being called into question." (more here)

    Kevin Shelley, former
    California Sec. of State





    VerifiedVoting.org, Inc., is a 501(c)(4) nonprofit corporation.

    © Copyright 2008, VerifiedVoting.org, Inc. All rights reserved, although reprint permission granted for nonprofit purposes with attribution to VerifiedVoting.org.


    Privacy    Site Map