Verified Voting Logo
Edit Your PreferencesContact VerifiedVoting.orgAbout VerifiedVoting.org
Verified Voting HomeJoin - Help us do this work!Donate - Help us do this work!Take Action Today!Endorse the resolution!
Printer Friendly Version
Site Map

See information for:

VerifiedVoting.org engages in lobbying activities permitted by IRC Section 501(c)(4). Please visit the Verified Voting Foundation for info about 501(c)(3) educational activities. You can also visit Vote Trust USA, a project of the Verified Voting Foundation. Also, check out our blog and twitter feed.

E-Mail This Page

Home   »  Press / Media  »  Media Coverage  »  VerifiedVoting.Org  »  Hundreds of thousands join ...


Hundreds of thousands join "Computer Ate My Vote" protest

by AFPstory here
July 13th, 2004

Article available at: http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/afp/20040713/ts_alt_afp/us_vote_technology_040713183743

Hundreds of thousands join "Computer Ate My Vote" protest

WASHINGTON (AFP) - Rallies were being held in 24 US cities and hundreds of thousands of people signed petitions to protest the use of what critics call "unverified" computer voting machines in the November presidential election.

The "Computer Ate My Vote" day of protest culminates a movement of activists from the tech sector and various political organizations to seek to halt the use of touch-screen or other electronic voting machines with a "paper trail" that can be audited or recounted.

"We have more than 300,000 signatures" for petitions to be delivered to election officials in 19 states calling for a verified audit system or "paper trail" if electronic balloting is used, said Will Doherty, executive director of the Verified Voting Foundation in San Francisco.

Doherty said a coalition supporting the effort includes organizations with with some three million people across the political spectrum.

While some critics of e-voting are also opponents of President George W. Bush (news - web sites), Doherty said the movement is "completely non-partisan."

"There are as many Republicans as Democrats who want to see votes counted accurately," he said.

"There is a grassroots movement for election integrity and some reasonable security in voting."

While manufacturers of the electronic vote machines insist they are more reliable than other systems, a series of glitches and errors involving e-voting has led to protests and legal action seeking safeguards.

About 20 percent of US voters have used new touch-screen or other electronic machines, according to the Information Technology Association of America and some estimates indicate that as many as 50 million may be using the new technology in the November election.

The technology upgrade is in part a response to the 2000 presidential election debacle in which a lengthy legal challenge over the counting of punch cards with partially removed "chads" (pieces of paper punched out mechanically to vote) in Florida delayed the final count.

But California election officials have banned the use of some electronic machines without a verifiable paper trail. A court ruling has upheld that ban, but an appeal is pending.

Doherty said the movement has made progress elsewhere, with the state of Nevada becoming the first with all-electronic machines including a paper trail.

In Ohio, he noted that 28 of 31 counties considering paperless e-voting rejected the option.

The petitions urge state election officials to sign a "Pledge of Ballot Integrity," committing to requiring computerized voting machines to produce paper records.

The Verifier Map

How do Americans cast their ballots? See the Verifier Map for detailed information on voting systems used in each state and county in recent elections.

voting equipment used in earlier elections (2004/2006)


Get E-Mail Alerts




Announcements

July 27, 2010
State Election Officials: Recountable Process A Must for Overseas Voters
July 20, 2010
Online Voting: All That Glitters Is Not Gold (Unless You're a Vendor)
June 21, 2010
Voting Without A Net In South Carolina
June 17, 2010
Voting results in New Jersey should not be mysterious
June 16, 2010
Verified Voting Calls for Recountable, Auditable Voting Systems Following South Carolina Primary
June 16, 2010
Voting integrity groups call for investigation of South Carolina voting systems in wake of unexpected primary results in Democratic US Senate race
June 15, 2010
On the South Carolina Primary
May 23, 2010
Benefits, risks of e-mail ballots weighed
May 4, 2010
PA - Team 4: Security Concerns About Voting Machines Remain
April 26, 2010
California Assembly committee endorses UC Berkeley statistician's election auditing method
March 8, 2010
Feds Move to Break Voting-Machine Monopoly
March 2, 2010
Is the Internet the Right Place for Our Ballots? Election Administration and Voting Rights Thought Leaders Weigh in on the Future of Overseas Voting at Summit 2010
February 25, 2010
Minnesota Civic Groups Refute Recount Claims
February 17, 2010
Groups and Election Officials Warn Department of Justice that Voting Machine Vendor Merger will Inflate Costs to Taxpayers, Threaten Election Accuracy and National Security
February 11, 2010
Fla. justices uphold local election law
February 3, 2010
NJ Judge Issues Mixed Order on Use of E-voting Machines
February 1, 2010
Ruling Issued in Rutgers–Newark Law School’s Constitutional Litigation Clinic Challenge to NJ's Electronic Voting Machines
February 1, 2010
Holt Statement on NJ Court Decision on Paper Ballots
January 28, 2010
Internet Voting, Still in Beta
January 28, 2010
MD: State elections head says new voting system costly, not effective

Important Links

  • VVBlog: Check out the latest news and commentary at our blog.
  • Election Day Problems?
    Call 1-866-OUR-VOTE
  • Find Your Polling Place: Vote411.org
  • Questions? Contact Us
  • Vote Trust USA - national resource for state-based organizations supporting verifiable elections, a Verified Voting Foundation project



  • "The core of our American democracy is the right to vote. Implicit in that right is the notion that that vote be private, that vote be secure, and that vote be counted as it was intended when it was cast by the voter. And I think what we're encountering is a pivotal moment in our democracy where all of that is being called into question." (more here)

    Kevin Shelley, former
    California Sec. of State





    VerifiedVoting.org, Inc., is a 501(c)(4) nonprofit corporation.

    © Copyright 2008, VerifiedVoting.org, Inc. All rights reserved, although reprint permission granted for nonprofit purposes with attribution to VerifiedVoting.org.


    Privacy    Site Map