Verified Voting Logo
Edit Your PreferencesContact VerifiedVoting.orgAbout VerifiedVoting.org
Verified Voting HomeJoin - Help us do this work!Donate - Help us do this work!Take Action Today!Endorse the resolution!
Printer Friendly Version

See information for:

VerifiedVoting.org engages in lobbying activities permitted by IRC Section 501(c)(4). Please visit the Verified Voting Foundation for info about 501(c)(3) educational activities. You can also visit Vote Trust USA, a project of the Verified Voting Foundation. Also, check out our blog and twitter feed.

E-Mail This Page

Home   »  Join Us  »  Volunteer  »  Adopt a Legislator


Adopt a Legislator



Meeting personally with your legislators or their staff is the most powerful way to get your message to them. So, talk with them in person about House bill H.R.2239 or the identical Senate companion bill S.1980. Let them know you want verifiable elections.

So, take some time to visit locally with one of your legislators. If you cannot schedule an appointment with the legislator, meet with the staff.

[If you cannot visit, then call and keep calling until you find out their position. Better yet, enlist the help of your friends and convince them to co-sponsor. Guidelines for calling are here.]

Here are some guidelines for holding a constituent meeting with your Senator, Representative, or their staff.

1. Choose a legislator.
2. Assemble a group for the meeting.
3. Schedule an appointment.
4. Research the legislator.
5. Plan a concise presentation.
6. Meet with the legislator.
7. Follow up with a thank you letter.

Be sure to report the results of the meeting to us at pass2239@verifiedvoting.org.

Steps for Constituent Meetings with Members of Congress


1.

Choose a Senator or Representative who is not already a co-sponsor. Check here to see your Representative’s position on H.R.2239. As far as we know, no Senators are co-sponsors yet.


2.

Assemble a small group of people (4 or 5) that enthusiastically support the bill and are also constituents of the legislator you choose to adopt.


3.

Schedule an appointment. Your legislators’ local office numbers are in the government pages of your phone book. You can also reach any congressional office using the Capitol switchboard (202-224-3121 or 888-508-2974). The DC staff can give the local number.


4.

Do your research. Review the legislator's voting record, committee assignments, and any views that have been publicly stated. A good place to start is on the legislator's web site. Go here, choose your state, and click on the legislators’ name.


5.

Plan what you will say. Keep it brief and to the point. We suggest something like this, but be sure to make it your own and from your heart:

a. It is a good idea to start by expressing appreciation for anything (big or small) you can find in their public record – something you can sincerely thank them for.

b. Let them know that you are very concerned about the fact that there is no way to be sure that an electronic voting machine recorded votes correctly, and there is no way to conduct a meaningful recount of the votes.

c. Point out that voting machine software is a trade secret and you believe that every part of an election procedure should be open to public scrutiny – especially the software that records and tallies votes. Traditionally, ballot counting has been an open process that is observed by election observers from both parties, but no one can observe the electronic recording and tallying.

d. Emphasize that all software has errors and if someone inserted malicious code, it could easily go without detection.

e. Tell them that you believe the bill (H.R.2239 or S.1980) is essential to ensure the integrity in our elections.

f. Take printed materials to leave with the legislator. We recommend our two-page introduction, a summary of the bill, and the responses to questions legislators often ask about the bill. We suggest that you also take this piece describing two recent electronic voting disasters.

We highly recommend that you DO NOT talk about sensational or speculative matters, but confine your discussion to undeniable facts. We believe the legislators will respond more positively to objective information than to fears and conspiracy theories.


6.

Arrive at least 5 minutes early for the meeting. Be positive, constructive, friendly, and brief. Start with each person introducing themselves, saying where they live, and giving a brief reason for their attendance. Then have one spokesperson give the presentation. Be sure to be concise. Ask the legislator’s position. Allow plenty of opportunity for listening to your legislator's views and concerns. Be sure to leave your printed materials.


7.

Follow-up with a thank you letter in which you restate your position very briefly.


The Verifier Map

How do Americans cast their ballots? See the Verifier Map for detailed information on voting systems used in each state and county in recent elections.

voting equipment used in earlier elections (2004/2006)


Get E-Mail Alerts




Announcements

August 26, 2010
On India’s Electronic Voting Controversy
August 25, 2010
Pac-Man for president: Hack highlights e-voting flaws
August 6, 2010
Voting Technology Research Gets In-Depth
July 27, 2010
State Election Officials: Recountable Process A Must for Overseas Voters
July 20, 2010
Online Voting: All That Glitters Is Not Gold (Unless You're a Vendor)
June 21, 2010
Voting Without A Net In South Carolina
June 17, 2010
Voting results in New Jersey should not be mysterious
June 16, 2010
Verified Voting Calls for Recountable, Auditable Voting Systems Following South Carolina Primary
June 16, 2010
Voting integrity groups call for investigation of South Carolina voting systems in wake of unexpected primary results in Democratic US Senate race
June 15, 2010
On the South Carolina Primary
May 23, 2010
Benefits, risks of e-mail ballots weighed
May 4, 2010
PA - Team 4: Security Concerns About Voting Machines Remain
April 26, 2010
California Assembly committee endorses UC Berkeley statistician's election auditing method
March 8, 2010
Feds Move to Break Voting-Machine Monopoly
March 2, 2010
Is the Internet the Right Place for Our Ballots? Election Administration and Voting Rights Thought Leaders Weigh in on the Future of Overseas Voting at Summit 2010
February 25, 2010
Minnesota Civic Groups Refute Recount Claims
February 17, 2010
Groups and Election Officials Warn Department of Justice that Voting Machine Vendor Merger will Inflate Costs to Taxpayers, Threaten Election Accuracy and National Security
February 11, 2010
Fla. justices uphold local election law
February 3, 2010
NJ Judge Issues Mixed Order on Use of E-voting Machines
February 1, 2010
Ruling Issued in Rutgers–Newark Law School’s Constitutional Litigation Clinic Challenge to NJ's Electronic Voting Machines

Important Links

  • VVBlog: Check out the latest news and commentary at our blog.
  • Election Day Problems?
    Call 1-866-OUR-VOTE
  • Find Your Polling Place: Vote411.org
  • Questions? Contact Us
  • Vote Trust USA - national resource for state-based organizations supporting verifiable elections, a Verified Voting Foundation project



  • "The core of our American democracy is the right to vote. Implicit in that right is the notion that that vote be private, that vote be secure, and that vote be counted as it was intended when it was cast by the voter. And I think what we're encountering is a pivotal moment in our democracy where all of that is being called into question." (more here)

    Kevin Shelley, former
    California Sec. of State





    VerifiedVoting.org, Inc., is a 501(c)(4) nonprofit corporation.

    © Copyright 2008, VerifiedVoting.org, Inc. All rights reserved, although reprint permission granted for nonprofit purposes with attribution to VerifiedVoting.org.


    Privacy    Site Map